View topic-related background literature as well as scientific publications of the DynaMORE consortium itself. Once new publications are available, we list them here. All DynaMORE publications will be made openly accessible, either immediately (GOLD open access) or after a maximum embargo period of 6 months following publication (GREEN open access).

DynaMORE Publications

2020

• Veer IM et al. (2020). Mental resilience in the Corona lockdown: First empirical insights from Europe. PsyArXiv Preprints. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4z62t. PDF
• Kalisch R et al. (2020). A generic solution for the operationalization and measurement of resilience and resilience processes in longitudinal observations: rationale and basic design of the MARP and LORA studies. PsyArXiv Preprints. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/jg238. PDF

2019

• Kalisch R et al. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing resilience: a dynamic network approach. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 14(5): 765–777. PDF
• Kampa M et al. (2019). Replication of fMRI group activations in the neuroimaging battery for the Mainz Resilience Project (MARP). NeuroImage. 204: 116223. PDF
• Kasanova Z et al. (2019). Temporal associations between sleep quality and paranoia across the paranoia continuum: An experience sampling study. J Abnorm Psychol. [Epub ahead of print].
• Wang H et al. (2019). Toward Understanding Developmental Disruption of Default Mode Network Connectivity Due to Early Life Stress. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 4 (1):5-7.

2018

• Kampa M et al. (2018). A Combined Behavioral and Neuroimaging Battery to Test Positive Appraisal Style Theory of Resilience in Longitudinal Studies. bioRxiv – The preprint server for biology: 470435. PDF

Scientific Background Literature

• Binder H et al. (2011). An overview of techniques for linking high-dimensional molecular data to time-to-event endpoints by risk prediction models. Biom J. 53(2): 170-89.
• Chmitorz A et al. (2018). Intervention studies to foster resilience – A systematic review and proposal for a resilience framework in future intervention studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 59: 78-100.
• Hermans EJ and Fernández G (2015). Heterogeneity of cognitive-neurobiological determinants of resilience. Behav Brain Sci. 38: e103.
• Kalisch R et al. (2017). The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nature Human Behaviour. 1: 784-790.
• Kalisch R, Müller MB, and Tüscher O (2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav Brain Sci. 38: e92.
• Kasanova Z et al. (2016). Early-Life Stress Affects Stress-Related Prefrontal Dopamine Activity in Healthy Adults, but Not in Individuals with Psychotic Disorder. PLoS One. 11(3): e0150746.
• Kleim B and Galatzer-Levy IR (2015). Appreciating methodological complexity and integrating neurobiological perspectives to advance the science of resilience. Behav Brain Sci. 38: e108.
• Kobylińska D and Karwowska D (2015). How automatic activation of emotion regulation influences experiencing negative emotions. Front Psychol. 6: 1628.
• Lin T et al. (2015). A neurobehavioral account for individual differences in resilience to chronic military stress. Psychol Med. 45(5): 1011-1023.
• Maiwald T at al. (2016). Driving the model to its limit: Profile likelihood based model reduction. PLoS One. 11(9): e0162366.
• Schiavone G, Lamichhane B, and Van Hoof C (2017). The Double Layer Methodology and the Validation of Eigenbehavior Techniques Applied to Lifestyle Modeling. BioMed Research International. 2017. Article ID 4593956: 15 pages.
• Walter H, Erk S, and Veer IM (2015). The temporal dynamics of resilience: Neural recovery as a biomarker. Behav Brain Sci. 38: e126.
• Wieringa FP et al. (2017). Wearable sensors: Can they benefit patients with chronic kidney disease? Expert Rev Med Devices. 14(7): 505-519.